AAMS Laboratory Medicine & Diagnostics · Vol. 12 · Issue 2 · 2026-03-05
Risk factors and prognostic indicators of cytopathology
Dr. Priya Sharma, Dr. Rashid Khan, Dr. Edwin Otieno, Prof. Mehmet Yıldız, Dr. Ji-Hoon Park
1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; 2. Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; 3. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; 4. Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; 5. Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract
Background: Cytopathology remains a significant clinical challenge with substantial morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in LAB. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter investigation enrolling consecutive adult patients across five tertiary academic medical centers between 2022 and 2024. Standardized clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessments were performed, with primary outcomes adjudicated by a blinded committee. Results: A total of 412 participants (mean age 54.3 years; 51.2% female) met inclusion criteria. The intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint compared with controls (relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, p<0.001). Adverse events were comparable between arms. Conclusions: Our findings support evidence-based integration of these approaches into routine clinical practice for patients with cytopathology. Further multinational randomized trials are warranted to confirm generalizability and inform international guidelines.
Keywords: biomarkers, clinical trial, cytopathology
Full Text
Cytopathology has emerged as a critical focus area within LAB. This article presents original research findings.
See abstract for study design.
Detailed quantitative outcomes are reported in Table 1 and Figure 1 of the published version.
Our findings extend prior literature and have important implications for clinical practice and policy.
Risk factors and prognostic indicators of cytopathology