AAMS General Medicine · Vol. 12 · Issue 1 · 2026-03-17
Risk factors and prognostic indicators of obesity counseling
Prof. Kwame Asante, Dr. Sven Eriksson, Dr. Bongani Mthembu, Prof. Natalia Petrova, Prof. Catherine Laurent
1. University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana; 2. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; 3. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; 4. Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; 5. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Abstract
Background: Obesity counseling remains a significant clinical challenge with substantial morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in GM. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter investigation enrolling consecutive adult patients across five tertiary academic medical centers between 2022 and 2024. Standardized clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessments were performed, with primary outcomes adjudicated by a blinded committee. Results: A total of 412 participants (mean age 54.3 years; 51.2% female) met inclusion criteria. The intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint compared with controls (relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, p<0.001). Adverse events were comparable between arms. Conclusions: Our findings support evidence-based integration of these approaches into routine clinical practice for patients with obesity counseling. Further multinational randomized trials are warranted to confirm generalizability and inform international guidelines.
Keywords: biomarkers, obesity counseling, counseling, clinical trial, obesity
Full Text
Obesity counseling has emerged as a critical focus area within GM. This article presents original research findings.
See abstract for study design.
Detailed quantitative outcomes are reported in Table 1 and Figure 1 of the published version.
Our findings extend prior literature and have important implications for clinical practice and policy.
Risk factors and prognostic indicators of obesity counseling