Global Cardiology Summit 2026 · 2026-06-15 · Surgery

Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Crowns in Prosthodontic Rehabilitation

Aslamov Akbarjon¹, Chakkanov Fakhriddin²
Samarkand State Medical University, Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, 1st year clinical ordinator¹, Assistant of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, Samarkand State Medical University

View on AAMS · All conferences

Abstract

Zirconia crowns have become increasingly popular in modern prosthodontic rehabilitation because of their superior esthetic characteristics, excellent mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and long-term durability. The development of advanced dental materials and computer-aided manufacturing technologies has significantly expanded the clinical use of zirconia restorations in fixed prosthodontics. Clinical assessment of zirconia crowns is essential for evaluating their functional performance, esthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and long-term success. This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of zirconia crowns in prosthodontic rehabilitation and determine their influence on oral function and treatment outcomes. The findings indicated that zirconia crowns provide favorable clinical results with high patient acceptance and long-term stability.

Keywords: zirconia crowns, prosthodontics, prosthodontic rehabilitation, dental restoration, esthetics, biocompatibility, fixed prosthesis, oral rehabilitation.

The restoration of damaged or missing tooth structures remains one of the major challenges in prosthodontic dentistry. Traditional metal-ceramic restorations have demonstrated good durability; however, limitations related to esthetics and metal-related reactions have encouraged the development of alternative restorative materials. Zirconia has emerged as a highly effective material due to its high fracture resistance, chemical stability, and natural appearance. Additionally, zirconia restorations exhibit favorable tissue compatibility and reduced plaque accumulation. Despite their widespread use, comprehensive clinical evaluation remains necessary to determine their effectiveness in long-term prosthodontic rehabilitation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of zirconia crowns in prosthodontic rehabilitation and assess their impact on esthetic, functional, and patient-related outcomes.

The study included 75 patients requiring fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation with zirconia crowns. Clinical examination was performed before treatment and during follow-up visits after crown placement. Parameters including marginal adaptation, gingival condition, occlusal stability, chewing efficiency, esthetic appearance, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Restorations were fabricated using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Follow-up assessments were conducted over a 12-month observation period.

The study demonstrated favorable clinical performance of zirconia crowns in the majority of patients. Excellent marginal adaptation and high esthetic outcomes were observed following treatment. Patients reported improved chewing function, comfort, and overall satisfaction with the restorations. Gingival tissues surrounding zirconia crowns showed minimal inflammatory changes, indicating good biocompatibility. Mechanical complications such as crown fracture or loss of retention occurred infrequently. Long-term follow-up demonstrated stable functional and esthetic outcomes with a high success rate.

Zirconia crowns represent an effective and reliable option for prosthodontic rehabilitation. Their superior esthetic properties, biocompatibility, and mechanical strength contribute to successful clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Modern zirconia-based restorations provide long-term functional stability and may be considered an important component of contemporary prosthodontic treatment strategies.

1. Anusavice K.J., Shen C., Rawls H.R. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. Elsevier; 2013.

2. Kelly J.R., Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):289–298.

3. Piconi C., Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20(1):1–25.

4. Raigrodski A.J. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(6):557–562.

5. Sailer I., Feher A., Filser F., et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(2):121–128.

6. Denry I., Kelly J.R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):299–307.

7. Zarone F., Russo S., Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):83–96.

8. Miyazaki T., Hotta Y., Kunii J., et al. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(4):236–261.

9. med1.uz – Educational resources and scientific materials on dentistry and prosthodontics.

10. Tinschert J., Natt G., Mautsch W., et al. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate and zirconia restorations. Dent Mater. 2001;17(5):413–421.