Loss of teeth and associated oral conditions remain important public health problems that may substantially affect quality of life. Functional impairment resulting from missing teeth often leads to difficulties in mastication, speech disturbances, esthetic concerns, and psychological discomfort. Modern prosthetic rehabilitation aims not only to replace missing dental structures but also to restore overall oral health and social confidence. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life has become an important parameter in determining the success of prosthetic treatment and patient-centered outcomes. Therefore, understanding the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation on patients’ daily life remains important in contemporary dental practice.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of prosthetic restorations on oral health-related quality of life and evaluate changes in functional and psychosocial outcomes following treatment.
The study included 90 patients aged between 30 and 75 years who underwent prosthodontic treatment with removable and fixed prosthetic restorations. Clinical evaluation and patient questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Parameters assessed included chewing ability, speech function, esthetic perception, social interactions, psychological well-being, and overall patient satisfaction. Oral health-related quality of life was measured using standardized assessment tools. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes before and after prosthetic rehabilitation.
The study demonstrated significant improvements in oral health-related quality of life following prosthetic rehabilitation. Patients reported better chewing efficiency and improved speech after treatment. Esthetic enhancement contributed to increased self-confidence and social comfort. Psychological well-being improved due to restoration of facial appearance and oral function. Patients receiving fixed prosthetic restorations generally demonstrated slightly higher satisfaction levels than those receiving removable prostheses; however, both treatment groups showed substantial improvements in overall quality of life. Adaptation to prosthetic devices gradually increased during follow-up assessments.
Prosthetic restorations have a significant positive impact on oral health-related quality of life by improving functional, esthetic, psychological, and social aspects of patient well-being. Successful prosthodontic treatment should focus not only on technical outcomes but also on patient-centered factors and quality-of-life indicators. Comprehensive prosthetic rehabilitation contributes substantially to improved oral health and overall patient satisfaction.
1. Zarb G.A., Hobkirk J., Eckert S., Jacob R. Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. Elsevier; 2013.
2. Allen P.F., McMillan A.S. The impact of tooth loss and oral rehabilitation on quality of life. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(10):662–666.
3. Slade G.D. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(4):284–290.
4. John M.T., Reissmann D.R., Feuerstahler L., et al. Exploratory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(9):635–643.
5. Emami E., de Souza R.F., Kabawat M., Feine J.S. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:498305.
6. Feine J.S., Carlsson G.E., Awad M.A., et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(4):413–414.
7. Inukai M., John M.T., Igarashi Y., Baba K. Association between prosthetic treatment and oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(2):109–115.
8. Awad M.A., Lund J.P., Dufresne E., Feine J.S. Comparing patient satisfaction with conventional and implant-supported prostheses. J Dent Res. 2003;82(5):356–360.
9. med1.uz – Educational resources and scientific materials on dentistry and prosthodontics.
10. Locker D., Allen F. What do measures of oral health-related quality of life measure? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(6):401–411.